Reverend Robert Shields – Would He Have Been the Ultimate Blogger?

Recently, while looking around for subjects to write about on my blog, I came across the story of the Reverend Robert Shields, who died a few months ago.

His claim to fame is that for 25 years he kept a diary – but not any old diary! From 1972 until 1997 he would spend at least four hours a day recording every detail of his life in five-minute segments. Nothing was left out – he even recorded his visits to the toilet (and what he did there) – to ensure that the entire day, every day, was accounted for. In his small office at his his family home in Dayton, Washington State, he kept half a dozen typewriters (Do you remember those?) on his desk just in case any one of them broke down due to over-use. He had them arranged in such a way that he could reach any one of them by using his swivel chair without having to get up.

Each day he would type about 3,000–6,000 words describing in fine detail his daily activities on to single sheets of paper. Eventually, he would bind these sheets into ledgers, which were stored in huge cardboard boxes and stacked to the ceiling just outside his office. As well as detailing his trips to the bathroom, he recorded his body temperature, blood pressure and his daily medication; he described every piece of junk mail he received, every meal he ate and the cost of virtually everything he bought. He even attached a nostril hair to one page so that scientists could study his DNA. He would sleep for just two hours a day so that he could describe the dreams he had experienced. In a good year he would write three million words, but in a bad year he would manage just one million. He would type everything down spontaneously as it came into his head and didn’t correct or edit anything. He said that he didn’t read any of the entries afterwards because if he did he wouldn’t have time to do anything else.

Eventually, in 1997, he succumbed to a massive stroke that curtailed his writing activities although he did attempt for a while to dictate his journal entries to his wife but, perhaps not surprisingly, she quickly became bored with the task. In 1999, he handed over his diary to Washington State University in 91 boxes on condition that it would not be read or subjected to a word count for at least 50 years. However, one sample page has found its way on to the Internet and can be viewed here.

I wonder what Robert Shields would have made of today’s blogging technology. Would he have used it to update his diary for all of us to read and comment on or would he have shied away from it because it was just too public an arena to reveal the details of his private life and personal thoughts? At his age, would he have understood or been afraid of Web 2.0, Windows XP/Vista or Mac OS 10.4/10.5? Or would he have become the world’s ultimate blogger and acquired the same sort of following that ‘Geriatric1927‘ (Peter Oakley) has amassed on YouTube. I suppose now we shall never know!

Something Quite Interesting About Book Sales

I’m a member of the Society for Editors and Proofreaders and I’ve been following a recent thread about books sales on their e-mail discussion forum, SfEPLine.

Apparently, a book publisher told one of our members that over half of all the books published in the United Kingdom sell less than 200 copies in their entire lifetime (or should that be shelf life?), which at first sight may seem somewhat surprising. However, with the advent of self-publishing and print-on-demand services, this sort of statistic does have a ring of truth about it because a large number of self-publishers don’t print that many copies of their book anyway and would consider themselves extremely lucky to sell even 100 copies to their friends and family.

Then another SfEP member, who specializes in editing works of fiction, told us that sales of a first novel in hardback produced by a commercial publisher are commonly very low and that total sales of just 600 copies per book was not at all unusual. Although the traditional way of publishing a book is to bring it out first as a hardback and then in paperback if potential sales warrant it, a lot of novels are published just as paperbacks. On the other hand, a lot of hardbacks are sold to public libraries – in fact some books would never have been published in the first place if it hadn’t been for the library market. Unfortunately, the bottom has fallen out of this market recently, which has caused big problems for publishing companies who produce fiction titles.

However, to a certain extent these lost library sales have been replaced by sales to a new breed of ‘collectors’ who buy autographed hardbacks as an investment. The rumour is that these collectors don’t actually read the books but keep them locked away so that they remain in mint condition so that they can be sold at a premium at a later date – perhaps when the author’s later works have broken into the best-seller lists.

Nowadays, public libraries are buying as many books as possible in paperback in order to save money but publishers prefer to sell them hardbacks instead because they have to sell far more copies of a paperback in order to break even financially. This means that novels with a smaller market (e.g. by a first-time author) are not viable to publish as a paperback. So unless publishers feel that they can sell enough hardback copies of a novel (or any other book) to make even a small profit they will reject a first-time author’s manuscript every time. And that is why there are so many hardback copies of celebrities’ autobiographies, cookbooks, etc. on the shelves in bookshops irrespective of how good they are – enough people buy them to make it worthwhile for publishers to produce them.

So, my advice to anybody who is writing their first novel is to publish it yourself! It will give you a great deal more satisfaction than receiving all those rejection slips and you will learn what it takes to produce, promote and sell a book. Give it a go and see where it takes you!